Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Date: 2008-04-02 17:00:46
Message-ID: 5769.1207155646@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> That cat is already out of the bag with every Linux distribution.
> There's just no point in our going three sides around the square in
> order to have someone, somewhere claim that our tarball isn't
> violating their law.

[shrug...]  It's not exactly terribly complicated to keep this stuff
in a contrib module.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-02 17:05:14
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2008-04-02 16:55:09
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-02 17:05:14
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2008-04-02 16:55:09
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group