Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love
Date: 2006-09-11 00:25:17
Message-ID: 5731.1157934317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> Should untsearch2.sql be renamed to uninstall_tsearch2.sql to be
> consistent with all the other uninstall scripts?

Yeah, that and lo_drop are outliers that probably ought to be renamed.
Offhand I don't see any serious compatibility objection --- who does
module removals except by hand? --- but if anyone sees a problem
speak now ...

I'm also wondering why the heck contrib/lo installs lo_test.sql.
That ought to be a regression test anyway, and we don't install
regression scripts.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-11 00:30:30 Re: Lock partitions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-10 23:59:58 Re: Fixed length data types issue

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-11 02:10:55 Re: contrib uninstall script fixes
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-09-10 23:52:37 Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love