Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: per user/database connections limit again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)parba(dot)cz>,Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per user/database connections limit again
Date: 2005-07-25 16:31:47
Message-ID: 5345.1122309107@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The new syntax for this command is CREATE/ALTER DATABASE/USER:
>                 | MAX CONNECTIONS Iconst
> This adds 'max' as a keyword, though at a fairly unreserved level, I
> think.  Should we use the syntax LIMIT CONNECTIONS so we don't have to
> add MAX as a keyword at all?

I didn't like that either.  I was thinking of just CONNECTIONS.
LIMIT CONNECTIONS sort of works grammatically, I guess.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2005-07-25 16:39:26
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-25 16:22:54
Subject: Re: per user/database connections limit again

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group