Re: updated join removal patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: updated join removal patch
Date: 2009-09-18 19:52:15
Message-ID: 5254.1253303535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The clauses are well-defined, but they don't have well-defined sides.
> I see now what you're going for with clause_matches_join, but
> "matches" is a pretty broad term, IMO.

clause_sides_match_join?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2009-09-18 20:03:27 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-18 19:46:06 Re: updated join removal patch