Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

From: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date: 2008-02-04 19:11:51
Message-ID: 52348.74.239.169.41.1202152311.squirrel@nuts.unixathome.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-general
On Mon, February 4, 2008 2:11 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> DVL,
>
>> Any respectable certification must be subjective.  You don't look at the
>> person, think about it, and decide. There must be a subjective and
>> independent test.  To do otherwise greatly reduces the value of the
>> certification.
>
> I think you mean "objective".

Yes, I do.  Sorry.

> Anyway, this is all fairly academic until Josh & Co. have  at least one
> certification exam at least halfway developed. At this point, I think
> we've collected enough opinions on -advocacy; maybe we should let the exam
> hackers do some work?

Yes, please.  Those that what to work on this project should discuss it on
the cert list, not advocacy.  Thank you.

-- 
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-02-04 19:48:16
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Certification
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-02-04 19:11:11
Subject: Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: fkater@googlemail.comDate: 2008-02-04 19:12:51
Subject: Alternative to tableoids?
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-02-04 19:11:11
Subject: Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group