On 01/02/13 13:26, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 07:16 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I'm happy to take opinions about this, and I expected some
>>> bikeshedding, but your reaction is contrary to everything others
>>> have told me. Mostly they love the operators.
>>> I guess that '~>' and '~>>' would work as well as '->' and '->>'.
>> Or +> and +>>, since ~ is set very high and small by some fonts
>> (where the fontmakers though of it as a kind of superscript character).
>> I suppose that := is out of the question?
> Even if it were I would not on any account use it. As an old Ada
> programmer my mind just revolts at the idea of using this for anything
> but assignment.
Ancient Algol 60 programmer here, otherwise ditto!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2013-02-01 01:01:33|
|Subject: Re: Cascading replication: should we detect/prevent cycles?|
|Previous:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2013-02-01 00:38:15|
|Subject: Re: json api WIP patch|