On 1/10/13 3:22 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> For versions >= 9.2 it would be better to allow passing in a
> pretty-print value, like 80 or 0, instead of just passing 'true'. The
> new line-wrapping that the integer argument triggers is much more
> readable than the supposedly pretty value that 'true' provides.

Ooh, I had no idea we exposed that in SQL.  I like this idea.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

• Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views at 2013-01-10 14:22:46 from Andrew Dunstan

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2013-01-10 14:56:58
	Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
Previous:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2013-01-10 14:22:46
	Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views