Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-10 14:24:42
Message-ID: 50EECF2A.1030806@joh.to (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/10/13 3:22 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> For versions >= 9.2 it would be better to allow passing in a
> pretty-print value, like 80 or 0, instead of just passing 'true'. The
> new line-wrapping that the integer argument triggers is much more
> readable than the supposedly pretty value that 'true' provides.

Ooh, I had no idea we exposed that in SQL.  I like this idea.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2013-01-10 14:56:58
Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2013-01-10 14:22:46
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group