On 1/10/13 3:22 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> For versions >= 9.2 it would be better to allow passing in a
> pretty-print value, like 80 or 0, instead of just passing 'true'. The
> new line-wrapping that the integer argument triggers is much more
> readable than the supposedly pretty value that 'true' provides.
Ooh, I had no idea we exposed that in SQL. I like this idea.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2013-01-10 14:56:58|
|Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2013-01-10 14:22:46|
|Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views|