From:
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To:
Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,
"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject:
Re: Cascading replication: should we detect/prevent cycles?
Date:
2013-01-08 18:46:12
Message-ID:
50EC6974.2080108@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2012-12-19 03:03:43 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2012-12-19 07:57:07 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2012-12-19 08:11:55 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2012-12-19 08:34:15 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2012-12-19 17:08:59 from "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2012-12-19 22:14:56 from Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2012-12-20 13:04:12 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-12-20 22:28:43 from Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2012-12-21 14:08:19 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2013-01-05 20:50:05 from Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2013-01-05 21:21:11 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2013-01-08 18:46:12 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2013-01-08 19:51:05 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2013-01-08 22:06:43 from Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
2013-01-09 01:51:58 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2013-01-09 01:59:43 from Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
2013-01-09 09:11:02 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2013-01-27 11:30:02 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2013-01-27 16:23:02 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2013-01-27 18:13:27 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2013-02-01 01:01:33 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2013-02-01 02:48:53 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2013-02-02 18:41:12 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2013-02-01 07:43:03 from Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
2013-02-01 08:16:10 from Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
2013-02-01 10:19:05 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2013-01-08 19:53:38 from David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
2013-01-08 20:30:49 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2012-12-20 00:18:40 from Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On 1/5/13 1:21 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 21 December 2012 14:08, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm sure it's possible; I don't *think* it's terribly easy.
>
> I'm inclined to agree that this isn't a terribly pressing issue.
> Certainly, the need to introduce a bunch of new infrastructure to
> detect this case seems hard to justify.
Impossible to justify, I'd say.
Does anyone have any objections to my adding this to the TODO list, in
case some clever GSOC student comes up with a way to do it *without*
adding a bunch of infrastructure?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Andres FreundDate: 2013-01-08 19:09:42Subject : [PATCH] xlogreader-v4Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2013-01-08 18:08:44Subject : pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files
