Neil Conway wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:13 PM
> To: John Hansen
> Cc: Dennis Bjorklund; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] lastval()
> John Hansen wrote:
> > Even more so if the 'currval(void) called before nextval(seq_name)'
> > error message could be supressed by a GUC variable and return 0
> > instead.
> I don't think that's a good idea at all. It seems
> unnecessary, it complicates the definition of the operation,
> and worse, "0" is a valid return value for currval(), so it
> would also be ambiguous.
K, No mysql-ism for postgresql then :)
(pardon my french)
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-05-11 05:23:06|
|Subject: Re: refactor index build |
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-05-11 04:12:37|
|Subject: Re: lastval()|