Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4

From: Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Items missing from some context menus in object browser of v1.16 beta4
Date: 2012-09-12 03:19:11
Message-ID: 504FFF2F.4020701@falter.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On 11.09.2012 19:41, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 02:04 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>> On 05.09.2012 23:12, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 23:55 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 16:57 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>>>>> On 27.08.2012 16:37, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>>>>>> Aloha!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I ran into this regression with v1.16 beta4 and filed a ticket.
>>>>>> So far I have seen this to affect indexes, primary keys and foreign keys
>>>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Added two small screenshots to the ticket to compare 1.4 and 1.16b4
>>>>>>       http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/377
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Erwin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to add more details to the ticket, buthttp://code.pgadmin.org/trac/  decided to answer with error messages .. seems to be offline for now?
>>>>> I'll add my findings here:
>>>>>
>>>>> Also seems to affect  foreign keys and unique indexes.
>>>>> But *not* tables, views, function, triggers, sequences or types ...
>>>>> Tested with PostgreSQL 9.1 and 8.4
>>>>>
>>>>> However, in seemingly arbitrary rare cases it works as it should. It's always the same for all objects under one table so far. I tried but failed to
>>>>> spot a difference between the involved tables.
>>>>>
>>>> As you said, the trac site seems to be done right now, so I can't check
>>>> your screenshots. I know there are some issues with the indexes right
>>>> now. See the thread intitled "pgAdmin III commit: Lots of work on
>>>> domains, and check constraints". I have a patch that may fix your
>>>> issues, but can't check as I can't see your screenshots. I mostly need
>>>> an answer from Dave, to know if I should apply my patch, or revert my
>>>> older patch.
>>>>
>>> trac is available now, thanks to Dave.
>>>
>>> My patch fixes the issue you found.
>> I have downloaded and tested with 1.16.0 (Sep 7 2012). I am afraid my results disagree, the regression is still there, all of it. Just like in the
>> screenshot in the ticket.
>>
>> The other thing I reported seems fixed, though: "Bug in SQL script for indexes", where the SQL script used the table name instead of the schema name.
>>
> Then you should try to give me an SQL script that I can execute and that
> will show the same issue. Because I tried again, and I don't have the
> issue.

It affects 9 out of 10 tables here. Just like the screenshots 
demonstrate. Items are missing from the context menu and the DEL key is 
not working.
I have tried again an to find anything that would bind the rare cases 
where it works normally together, but no luck.
If I recreate the table in another schema it stops to work.
If I restart pgAdmin, the same tables exhibit normal behavior, so it's 
not totaly random.
pgAdmin 1.14.3 does not display the problem.

I fail to see how I could provide an SQL script.
Maybe it's specific to Windows (XP)?


Regards
Erwin


In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2012-09-12 12:55:45
Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Fix version number in upgrade script.
Previous:From: Begina FelicysymDate: 2012-09-11 22:59:49
Subject: Odp: PL pgAdmin website commit: Automatic stringmerge using merge script.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group