Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Please HELP - URGENT - transaction wraparound
Date: 2005-10-31 17:13:15
Message-ID: 5.2.1.1.1.20051101010912.03442a08@localhost (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
At 07:48 PM 10/30/2005 +0000, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:

>"Panic" - that's my middle name. ;)
>
>Had I known how to identify the database at fault, and that it would have 
>had no effect on the other databases, then I would have handled this 
>episode differently.

Wonder if it would be a good idea for the error messages to identify which 
databases might have lost data.

However if you have a fair number of databases involved you might get a 
fair number of log messages. Still, I think I wouldn't mind 100 lines in 
the logs if I had 100 databases at risk...

:)

Link.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Marcel ThibaultDate: 2005-10-31 17:21:18
Subject: Table Qualifiers in Update Statement
Previous:From: Andrew RawnsleyDate: 2005-10-31 17:07:21
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group