Re: why roll-your-own s_lock? / improving scalability
| From: |
Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de> |
| To: |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: |
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: |
Re: why roll-your-own s_lock? / improving scalability |
| Date: |
2012-06-26 19:06:02 |
| Message-ID: |
4FEA081A.2030506@schokola.de (view raw or flat) |
| Thread: |
|
| Lists: |
pgsql-hackers |
> But if you start with "let's not support any platforms that don't have this feature"
This will never be my intention.
Nils
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Merlin Moncure | Date: 2012-06-26 19:33:33 |
| Subject: Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side |
| Previous: | From: Nils Goroll | Date: 2012-06-26 19:05:12 |
| Subject: Re: why roll-your-own s_lock? / improving scalability |
