Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Date: 2012-04-30 22:44:20
Message-ID: 4F9F15C4.8030202@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On 4/30/12 3:40 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
>> I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
>> mean anything. 
> 
> Indeed.  Just take a survey of programming languages.

Oh, and also: Object-Relational != Object-Oriented

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-05-01 00:20:04
Subject: Call for Lightning Talks for pgCon
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-04-30 22:40:52
Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group