Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xReader, double-effort

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: xReader, double-effort
Date: 2012-04-27 22:19:24
Message-ID: 4F9B1B6C.5010300@2ndQuadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 04/26/2012 12:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't recall seeing any previous postings about the 2Q project,
> either.  We should try to keep these discussions on-list.

First brought up two months ago to the list it seemed most relevant to 
at the time: 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/2012-02/msg00001.php and 
the solid commentary started coming out yesterday, right near the 
approach of May as promised.  There hasn't been much posted on hackers 
about this out of respect for the extended CommitFest.

I personally suggested Aakash vent ideas out on pgsql-students (or here) 
at the beginning of the month: 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-students/2012-04/msg00002.php but 
the next time I heard about the subject was the acceptance notice.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2012-04-27 22:21:08
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2012-04-27 22:18:38
Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group