Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Date: 2012-04-05 06:02:16
Message-ID: 4F7D3568.1020308@cybertec.at (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2012-04-04 21:30 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
> I think this patch is doing two things: first touching infrastructure
> stuff and then adding lock_timeout on top of that.  Would it work to
> split the patch in two pieces?
>

Sure. Attached is the split version.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-- 
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig&  Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
      http://www.postgresql.at/


Attachment: 2-lock_timeout.patch
Description: text/x-patch (42.4 KB)
Attachment: 1-timeout-framework.patch
Description: text/x-patch (55.2 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hitoshi HaradaDate: 2012-04-05 06:39:53
Subject: Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2012-04-05 06:00:49
Subject: Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group