From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Odd out of memory problem. |
Date: | 2012-03-26 17:06:37 |
Message-ID: | 4F70A21D.4070407@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26.03.2012 19:59, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 26.03.2012 19:51, Greg Stark wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>> wrote:
>>> Combo CIDs: 755490840 total in 100 blocks; 5161072 free (381
>>> chunks); 750329768 used
>>
>> I think you'll have to catch Heikki's attention to get a good answer
>> to this.
>>
>> Is it possible this job is inserting and then updating (or deleteing)
>> the row it just inserted and doing a large number of such
>> insert/update operations all within the same transaction? Or perhaps
>> it's updating the same row over and over again?
>
> .. and all that in different subtransactions.
sorry, scratch that, they don't need to be in different subtransactions.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-26 17:15:47 | Re: Odd out of memory problem. |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2012-03-26 17:01:21 | Re: Odd out of memory problem. |