Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions
Date: 2011-04-26 21:17:58
Message-ID: 4F4ADE2A-02E2-460E-B780-155B04318E5B@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Apr 26, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> Remember the bgworker patches extracted from Postgres-R?

Oh, right.  I should have remembered that.

> [ Interestingly enough, one of the complaints I heard back then (not
> necessarily from you) was that there's no user for bgworkers, yet.
> Smells a lot like a chicken and egg problem to me. ]

IIRC, we kind of got stuck on the prerequisite wamalloc patch, and that sunk the whole thing.  :-(

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2011-04-26 21:19:02
Subject: Re: Bad COMPACT_ALLOC_CHUNK size in tsearch/spell.c?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-04-26 21:17:48
Subject: Re: sequence privileges in information schema

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group