On 02/22/2012 03:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Maybe I need to be more clear. The C code I'm writing will process
>> composites. I want to cache the Oids of certain non-builtin types in the
>> function info's fn_extra, and then be able to test whether or not the
>> fields in the composites are of those types.
> What's your basis for identifying those types in the first place?
> Name? Doesn't seem terribly robust if the other extension can be
> installed in some random schema. But anyway, something in
> parser/parse_type.c ought to help you with that --- maybe
Thanks, that might do the trick.
I fully agree it's not bulletproof, but I'm not sure what alternative
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-02-22 20:37:29|
|Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2012-02-22 20:32:09|
|Subject: Re: REASSIGN OWNED lacks support for FDWs|