> Andy replied to me privately that RUBIX is not open source.
> The claims about "full integration" aren't ones that I can test/verify, so we'll need feedback from the SE-Postgres devs on that. Kevin is responding to the other thread on pgsql-advocacy. Once both issues are resolved, we can update the language where appropriate.
Well, for that matter, the statement about SEPostgres was true at the
time 9.1 was released (TrustedRUBIX was not released until November
2011), so I'm not sure changing the language on the wiki is even
appropriate. If we do change it, then I suggest simply changing the
word "only" to "first".
Of course, I'm tempted to say "only significant". ;-)
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-02-17 20:24:16|
|Subject: Re: incorrect claim regarding SE-Postgres|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-02-17 18:43:43|
|Subject: Re: re-ordering quotes|