Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)
On 31.01.2012 17:35, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote: >> On 20.01.2012 15:32, Robert Haas wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas >>> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here's another version of the patch to make XLogInsert less of a >>>> bottleneck >>>> on multi-CPU systems. The basic idea is the same as before, but several >>>> bugs >>>> have been fixed, and lots of misc. clean up has been done. >>> >>> >>> This seems to need a rebase. >> >> >> Here you go. > > The patch seems to need a rebase again. Here you go again. It conflicted with the group commit patch, and the patch to WAL-log and track changes to full_page_writes setting. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment: xloginsert-scale-7.patch
Description: text/x-diff (94.0 KB)
Description: text/x-diff (94.0 KB)
In response to
- Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) at 2012-01-31 15:35:35 from Fujii Masao
Responses
- Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) at 2012-02-08 18:32:52 from Jeff Janes
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI Date: 2012-02-02 07:51:37 Subject: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Previous: From: Dmitriy Igrishin Date: 2012-02-02 07:33:24 Subject: unsigned and signed chars in libpq API