Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot standby off of hot standby?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot standby off of hot standby?
Date: 2012-01-30 18:06:09
Message-ID: 4F26DC11.1040107@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On 1/29/12 8:36 PM, Igor Schtein wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is it possible to use a standby instance as a master/primary for another
> standby in Postgres 9.0?  In other words, does PG 9.0 supports cascading
> standby configuration?

No, that's a 9.2 feature in development.

If you can build PostgreSQL from source and apply patches, we could use
your help testing it!

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2012-01-30 18:15:39
Subject: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Previous:From: hubert depesz lubaczewskiDate: 2012-01-30 17:53:45
Subject: Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2012-01-30 18:35:21
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
Previous:From: hubert depesz lubaczewskiDate: 2012-01-30 17:53:45
Subject: Re: pg_dump -s dumps data?!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group