On 11/27/2011 09:18 AM, NISHIYAMA Tomoaki wrote:
>>>>> +/* __MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR is related to both 32/64 bit gcc compiles by
>>>>> + * mingw-w64, however it gots defined only after
>>>>> Why not use __MINGW32__, which is defined without including any headers?
>>> Because it's defined by other than mingw-w64 compilers.
>> I see. That's because mingw (not -w64).
>> Should it be ok if mingw is ok with that condition?
> This really breaks mingw gcc 4.6.1 :( it does not have crtdefs.h)
> If moving downward do not break MSVC, perhaps its the good way.
> Otherwise, we might check for the presence of crtdefs.h with configure?
I have looked at this a bit. It's fairly ugly, and the only moderately
clean way I see forward is a configure test to check for a mingw-w64
compiler, e.g. by running gcc -E -dM over a file which just includes
stdio.h and checking for the definedness of __MINGW64__VERSION_MAJOR, or
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2011-12-01 16:32:10|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers|
|Previous:||From: Jeff Janes||Date: 2011-12-01 14:58:14|
|Subject: Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits|