| From: | Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: transaction error handling |
| Date: | 2011-11-30 08:27:05 |
| Message-ID: | 4ED5E8D9.6080205@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs |
I have the same confusion...
于 2011/11/30 2:34, Rob Richardson 写道:
> Very naïve question here: Why would you want to save the data from the first insert?
>
> I thought the purpose of a transaction was to make sure that all steps in the transaction executed, or none of them executed. If Oracle saves half of the data between the beginning and ending of the transaction, doesn't that defeat the purpose of the transaction?
>
> RobR
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bèrto ëd Sèra | 2011-11-30 08:48:39 | Re: transaction error handling |
| Previous Message | Lukasz Brodziak | 2011-11-30 07:40:47 | Re: Database is in recovery mode. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bèrto ëd Sèra | 2011-11-30 08:48:39 | Re: transaction error handling |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-11-30 03:53:39 | Re: BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work [sec=UNCLASSIFIED] |