From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Date: | 2011-10-26 17:25:32 |
Message-ID: | 4EA8428C.7070601@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/26/2011 12:47 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> If that was what he meant, I'd vote against it. There are way too many
>> people who will *not* want their databases configured to be able to
>> reach out onto the net. This feature should be something that has to be
>> installed by explicit user action.
> That is not what I meant.
>
> I meant installed the shared library by defualt, but still require
> CREATE EXTENSION.
>
I don't see why it should be different from other standard modules, such
as citext or hstore, both of which have pretty wide use, and less
possible security implications than this.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-26 17:27:03 | Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-26 17:09:34 | Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load |