Re: Using regoper type with OPERATOR()

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Tony Theodore <tony(dot)theodore(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using regoper type with OPERATOR()
Date: 2011-10-09 21:22:54
Message-ID: 4E9210AE.3010107@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On 10/10/11 10:03, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 08/10/11 19:21, Tony Theodore wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 06:33, Gavin Flower<GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:
[...]
>> BTW, is novice the right list for questions like these?
>
> I think so, but the pgsql-sql list would probably not be appropriate
> as you are not asking a trivial question - on balance, I feel this
> list is best. IMHO How is that for a definitive answer! :-)
>
I meant to say "... not be inappropriate ... " aaaaarrrrrrghhh!!!!!

[...]

Cheers,
Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jjurban 2011-10-11 22:31:34 ERROE:"Catalog is missing 28 elements from RELID mmmmmm."
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2011-10-09 21:03:52 Re: Using regoper type with OPERATOR()