On 18.08.2011 17:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 07.07.2011 18:43, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>> OK. I'll work on this tonight unless Dan jumps in to claim it.
>> Committed. I removed the second expected output file, and marked the
>> prepared-transactions tests in the schedule as "ignore" instead. That
>> way if max_prepared_transactions=0, you get a notice that the test case
>> failed, but pg_regress still returns 0 as exit status.
> Why did you only commit on 9.1 branch?
I did "git push origin master REL9_1_STABLE", and didn't notice that it
failed on master. Rebased and pushed, thanks!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-08-18 14:12:56|
|Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-08-18 14:07:41|
|Subject: Re: SSI 2PC coverage |