On 6/7/11 1:11 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> that appear low risk. I seriously doubt that I would consider *any*
>> > meaningful change in the locking area to be low risk.
> That's a shame. We'll fix it in 9.2 then.
I will point out that we bounced Alvaro's FK patch, which *was*
submitted in time for CF4, because of unknown locking impact.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com