From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch |
Date: | 2011-06-07 15:56:45 |
Message-ID: | 4DEE4A3D.9080407@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/06/2011 04:43 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jun 03 09:17:08 -0400 2011:
>>> I've now spent enough time working on this issue now to be convinced
>>> that the approach has merit, if we can work out the kinks. I'll start
>>> with some performance numbers.
>>
>> I hereby recommend that people with patches such as this one while on
>> the last weeks till release should refrain from posting them until the
>> release has actually taken place.
>
> %(at)#!
>
> Next time I'll be sure to only post my patches during beta if they suck.
>
I think Alvaro's point isn't directed at you Robert but at the idea that
this should be applied to 9.1.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-07 15:57:37 | Re: WALInsertLock tuning |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-07 15:50:23 | Re: BUG #6041: Unlogged table was created bad in slave node |