Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Exclusion Constraints on Arrays?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Exclusion Constraints on Arrays?
Date: 2012-05-22 18:58:04
Message-ID: 4DC8D284-05CF-4E3D-9670-AC9A32C37A36@justatheory.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 22, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> It seems probably workable given that we expect the pending list to be
> of fairly constrained size.  However, the commit message referenced
> upthread also muttered darkly about GIN's partial match logic not working
> in amgettuple.  I do not recall the details of that issue, but unless we
> can solve that one too, there's not much use in fixing this one.

Well, what about a GiST operator family/class for arrays?

Best,

David


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-22 19:31:08
Subject: Re: WIP: parameterized function scan
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-22 18:01:39
Subject: Re: Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group