Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2011-02-26 01:21:50
Message-ID: 4D6855AE.4000401@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/25/11 4:57 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:44 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Hmmm, I don't follow this.  The user can only disable syncrep for their
>> own transactions.   If they don't care about the persistence of their
>> transaction post-failover, why should the DBA care?
> 
> I think that's the difference between failover and switchover, right? At
> least Slony makes such a distinction, as well.

Yeah.  Actually, what would be even simpler and more to the point would
be a command that says "flush all transactions from Server A to Server
B, then fail over".

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Daniel FarinaDate: 2011-02-26 01:32:03
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2011-02-26 00:57:03
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group