Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Date: 2011-02-24 15:57:27
Message-ID: 4D667FE7.5030206@cs.helsinki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, did we decide to do it that way? OK with me, but the submitted docs
> are woefully inadequate on the point. This behavior is going to have to
> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
> about it :-().

I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is
going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the
patch is not going to be in 9.1. Does this sound acceptable?

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-24 16:02:57 Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2011-02-24 15:28:50 Re: Named restore points