Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+
Date: 2010-11-05 22:33:03
Message-ID: 4CD4861F.3040207@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11/5/10 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> What plaforms do we need to test to get a reasonable idea? Solaris,
>> FreeBSD, Windows?
> 
> At least.  I'm hoping that Greg Smith will take the lead on testing
> this, since he seems to have spent the most time in the area so far.

I could test at least 1 version of Solaris, I think.

Greg, any recommendations on pgbench parameters?

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-11-05 22:33:17
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-11-05 22:31:07
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group