Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.
Date: 2010-10-14 12:55:22
Message-ID: 4CB6B76A02000025000369B1@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Robert Haas  wrote:
 
> Is this a JDBC patch or a PG patch? Are we tracking JDBC patches
> using the CF app?
 
If this were the only patch for setQueryTimeout in front of us I
probably wouldn't have suggested that, but this thread started with a
patch proposal to implement the same JDBC feature through adding new
backend functions.  Unless that patch is withdrawn or rejected, it
seems odd for two different groups to be simultaneously considering
patches to implement exactly the same functionality....
 
-Kevin

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kenneth MarshallDate: 2010-10-14 13:46:16
Subject: Re: Why do we have a database specification in .pgpass?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-10-14 12:50:35
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Daniele VarrazzoDate: 2010-10-14 13:15:30
Subject: XA Xid to PostgreSQL transaction ID
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-10-14 12:22:21
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group