Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Duplicates Processing

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gary Chambers <gwchamb(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Duplicates Processing
Date: 2010-10-12 15:14:34
Message-ID: 4CB47B5A.2070001@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql
Gross generalization perhaps, but keep in mind what the over app/system
needs of the components.  Bounce those off you standard ER modeling
instincts and vice versa and you have a chance!

On 10/12/2010 08:19 AM, Gary Chambers wrote:
> Rob,
> 
> Thanks for your reply!
> 
>> And to your point of self-reference, it would be to a co-worker more
>> than a manager.  Managers are often not good replacements for workers. :)
> 
> :)  Absolutely!
> 
> I was having a conversation over on #postgresql yesterday about this
> and, due to my inexperience with managing electronic components (and
> some of the database issues involved), I still have a few unanswered
> questions.  I would like to create a master table of parts derived
> from the individual tables (e.g. resistors, capacitors, diodes, etc.).
>  I have the rare opportunity to build this from the ground, up and
> would like to ensure that I get it right.  Thanks for any advice that
> you (or anyone) can offer.
> 
> -- Gary Chambers

In response to

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: James CloosDate: 2010-10-15 09:57:23
Subject: Re: counting related rows
Previous:From: Gary ChambersDate: 2010-10-12 14:19:24
Subject: Re: Duplicates Processing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group