On 03/09/10 15:16, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> * We need a smarter way to do pg_start/stop_backup() with this. At the
>> moment, you can only have one backup running at a time, but we shouldn't
>> have that limitation with this built-in mechanism.
> Well there's no particular reason we couldn't support having multiple
> pg_start_backup() pending either. It's just not usually something
> people have need so far.
The backup label file makes that hard. There can be only one at a time.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-09-03 12:40:47|
|Subject: Re: thousand unrelated data files in pg_default tablespace|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2010-09-03 12:27:36|
|Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...|