Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Date: 2010-08-26 10:24:33
Message-ID: 4C7640E1.9060600@lelarge.info (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
Le 26/08/2010 12:15, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:02, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> Le 26/08/2010 11:49, Dave Page a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>>> What I've come to is this patch. Actually, and quite surprisingly, it
>>>>> doesn't work. I have no idea why. The configure script finds if we have
>>>>> or not the PQconninfoParse function(), but the #ifdef in pgConn source
>>>>> file doesn't seem to do what it has to. I always get a build without
>>>>> PQconninfoParse, wether configure founds it or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas on what I did wrong?
>>>>
>>>> EPATCHNOTFOUND
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oops, time to get some coffee, as you already said :)
>>
>> There's two ways you can fix it. To match what we do for SSL support:
>>
>> In acinclude.m4, you don't need to use AC_SUBST, and you do need to
>> add something like:
>>
>>                if test "$PG_SSL" = "yes"
>>                then
>>                        CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -DSSL"
>>                fi
>>
>> but for HAVE_CONNINFOPARSE (yes, I know we should probably do this in
>> CXXFLAGS, but now is not the time to fix the build system :-p ).
>>
>> The other way uses AC_SUBST to add the variable to the Makefile (which
>> you did). You can then use that variable in Makefile.am to
>> conditionally add the -DHAVE_CONNINFOPARSE. Iirc, that's similar to
>> have we deal with the options to build an appbundle.
> 

OK, great. Thanks. I used the former, more simple to me. Patch attached.

> Completely uninformed question:
> how does that work out wrt the VC project files?
> 

I have absolutely no idea. But a quick look doesn't even get anything
about how PG_SSL is handled by the VC project files.


-- 
Guillaume
 http://www.postgresql.fr
 http://dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-08-26 10:31:35
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-08-26 10:24:02
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group