On 06/08/10 20:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine
>> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in
>> the xmlexists patch?
> Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.
Updated the patch so that it will apply to head and re-worked the
function to use the new xpath internal function.
Registered Linux user: 379787
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mike Fowler||Date: 2010-08-07 15:47:17|
|Subject: Re: review: xml_is_well_formed|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-08-07 14:36:23|
|Subject: Re: gincostestimate |
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-08-08 19:18:17|
|Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function |
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-08-06 19:55:05|
|Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function|