Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report
Date: 2010-08-06 14:31:13
Message-ID: 4C5BD66102000025000342B8@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
 
> With only ten days to go, in order to leave time for committers to
> do their thing, we need to be wrapping up the remaining patches. 
> I think we look pretty good.  Of the remaining six patches, two
> are Work in Progress, so are not expected to go to a committer;
> three involve a committer, so I figure they can decide when and if
> it's time to return or move them, which just leaves one which is
> down to tweaking docs.
 
How embarrassing -- I miscounted.  It appears I counted Peter's WiP
patch in two categories and missed counting the "unlimited
parameters for xslt_process" in the above paragraph.  (An omission
which jumped out at me when reading this morning's posts.)  Mike
Fowler's latest post says "neither the existing code or the patched
code appear able to evaluate the parameters."  Is it time to mark
this "Returned with Feedback" and hope for a new patch in the next
CF?
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marcelo MasDate: 2010-08-06 14:39:28
Subject: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-08-06 14:31:03
Subject: Re: postgres 9.0 crash when bringing up hot standby

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-08-06 19:55:05
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Previous:From: Mike FowlerDate: 2010-08-06 08:04:15
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group