From:
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix log_temp_files docs and
comments to say bytes not kilobytes.
Date:
2010-07-07 22:48:23
Message-ID:
4C350437.3000505@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-06-25 13:11:25 from sriggs(at)postgresql(dot)org (Simon Riggs)
2010-06-25 14:25:50 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2010-06-25 15:11:03 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-06-25 17:56:44 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2010-06-27 11:48:46 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-06 14:21:06 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 14:42:16 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-06 14:52:48 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 15:03:45 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2010-07-06 15:05:06 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 15:10:18 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-06 15:17:02 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 15:25:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-06 15:29:38 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 18:38:48 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 19:40:31 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-06 20:01:30 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 21:49:15 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-06 23:09:21 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 15:06:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-07 22:48:23 from Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
2010-07-08 00:32:12 from Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-06 14:51:56 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers
On 7/6/10 8:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> It might be that nobody's using any values other than 0 and -1 ...
> in which case it wouldn't matter anyway. I agree that the lack of
> bug reports is notable. But still, don't we try to avoid behavioral
> changes in stable branches?
I think most people are doing what I was doing: looking at the values in
the logs, and writing math appropriately. Most of the other log output
isn't documented well, and the output values are obviously bytes, so
frankly it never occurred to me to check the docs.
Agreed that backporting the fix to 8.3 and 8.4 is infeasible.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-07 22:50:07Subject : Re: Bug? Concurrent COMMENT ON and DROP objectPrevious :From : Josh BerkusDate : 2010-07-07 22:44:08Subject : Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
pgsql-committers by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-08 00:14:04Subject : pgsql: Fix "cannot handle unplanned sub-select" error that can occur Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2010-07-07 21:31:52Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add note that using PL/Python 2 and 3 in the same session will
