Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Aidan Van Dyk" <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-12 13:55:01
Message-ID: 4BC2DFE50200002500030720@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:
 
> We've had people complaining that wal-replay can't keep up with a
> wal stream from a heavy server.
 
I thought this thread was about the slow performance running a mix
of read-only queries on the slave versus the master, which doesn't
seem to have anything to do with the old issue you're describing.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Erik RijkersDate: 2010-04-12 14:00:51
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2010-04-12 13:46:49
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group