Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: damage control mode

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-02-08 17:34:54
Message-ID: 4B704B3E.2030005@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/8/10 7:31 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Eh?  Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be
>> written after feature freeze.  Is this no longer acceptable?

My $0.0201115:

Depends on the feature, I'd say.  If it's sufficiently obvious to test
the feature without full documentation, then sure.  If, however,
reviewers can't adequately test the patch because they don't know all of
the syntax being implemented, then docs are a requirement.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-02-08 17:38:55
Subject: Re: Order of operations in lazy_vacuum_rel
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-08 17:29:39
Subject: Order of operations in lazy_vacuum_rel

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group