Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 10:36:59
Message-ID: 4B582E4B.8090603@archonet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
On 21/01/10 09:37, Dave Page wrote:
> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>
> Wait for it....
>
> 9.0.

You don't have a code-name. All the cool kids have code-names for their 
projects.

There - that should distract everyone from actual release-related work 
for the next week or so :-)

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-01-21 10:39:39
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-01-21 10:21:15
Subject: Re: An example of bugs for Hot Standby

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-01-21 10:39:39
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous:From: Massa, Harald ArminDate: 2010-01-21 09:47:18
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group