From:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org,
John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject:
Re: pgsql: Get rid of the need for manual maintenance
of the initial
Date:
2010-01-05 02:34:07
Message-ID:
4B42A51F.5020400@dunslane.net (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-01-05 01:06:57 from tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org (Tom Lane)
2010-01-05 01:28:55 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-01-05 02:20:42 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 02:34:07 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2010-01-05 17:24:39 from Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
2010-01-05 17:40:02 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 17:40:04 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-01-05 17:49:24 from Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
2010-01-05 17:51:48 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 18:11:05 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-01-05 18:18:28 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 18:44:07 from Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
2010-01-05 19:02:51 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 19:23:15 from Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
2010-01-05 19:31:43 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 19:43:56 from Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
2010-01-05 20:23:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 19:37:51 from Garick Hamlin <ghamlin(at)isc(dot)upenn(dot)edu>
2010-01-05 19:42:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 20:36:30 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2010-01-05 20:48:23 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-05 19:04:05 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Awesome.
>>
>
> It still needs some makefile work, but I wanted to push it in so we
> could see if the MSVC stuff works.
>
>
>
Looks like it does.
cheers
andrew
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-05 02:58:58Subject : Does parallel make require guards against duplicate actions?Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2010-01-05 02:34:03Subject : pgsql: Remove too-smart-for-its-own-good optimization of not overwriting
pgsql-committers by date
Next :From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-05 03:42:30Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove too-smart-for-its-own-good optimization of not overwritingPrevious :From : Tom LaneDate : 2010-01-05 02:34:03Subject : pgsql: Remove too-smart-for-its-own-good optimization of not overwriting
