Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CommitFest status/management

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-01 04:17:04
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm going to look at the YAML format for EXPLAIN patch shortly.
> Do we have consensus yet that we want YAML?  It seemed, well,
> yet another format without all that much advantage over what's
> there.

I think you and I are the two main skeptics ;-) But we seem to be rather 
in the minority, and it's not terribly invasive from what I have seen so 



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2009-12-01 04:28:28
Subject: Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2009-12-01 04:11:50
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group