Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm going to look at the YAML format for EXPLAIN patch shortly.
>>     
>
> Do we have consensus yet that we want YAML?  It seemed, well,
> yet another format without all that much advantage over what's
> there.
>
> 			
>   

I think you and I are the two main skeptics ;-) But we seem to be rather 
in the minority, and it's not terribly invasive from what I have seen so 
far.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: CommitFest status/management at 2009-12-01 04:08:19 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management at 2009-12-02 01:00:21 from Josh Berkus

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: David Fetter	Date: 2009-12-01 04:28:28
	Subject: Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
Previous:	From: David E. Wheeler	Date: 2009-12-01 04:11:50
	Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management