Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Calculation of unused columns

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Volker Grabsch" <vog(at)notjusthosting(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Calculation of unused columns
Date: 2009-10-19 17:48:42
Message-ID: 4ADC602A020000250002BB2E@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
 
> I think we should have a 4th class of functions,
> volatile-without-side-effects 
 
Sounds reasonable to me.
 
> (better name needed, obviously).
 
Well, from this list (which is where volatile points), mutable seems
closest to OK, but I'm not sure I like any of them.
 
http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/fickle
 
Anyone else have an idea?
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-10-19 17:48:58
Subject: Re: Calculation of unused columns
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-10-19 17:43:20
Subject: Re: Calculation of unused columns

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group