Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Date: 2009-08-12 01:42:50
Message-ID: 4A821E1A.5050408@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>
>> Of course
>> in all likelihood tom would have rewritten their first patch
>> anyways...
>>
>
> Maybe I'm taking life too seriously at the moment, but I find this
> comment kind of snide and unhelpful.
>

Yes, you're taking life too seriously ;-) I took it that there was an
implied smiley at the end of this remark. It certainly didn't strike me
that it was snide.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-12 01:54:21 Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-12 01:42:37 Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-08-12 01:44:02 Re: "Hot standby"?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-12 01:42:37 Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)