Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Date: 2009-06-30 13:07:33
Message-ID: 4A4A0E15.60005@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
>
> *especially* if those grants remain "by reference", i.e. If I change the
> GRANTS/REVOKES on sensitive_table, those are automatically "apply" to all
> tables created with the "WITH GRANTS LIKE sensitive_table"...
>
>
>   

Isn't that exactly what Tom is objecting to, namely that the permissions 
of an object would not be contained entirely in catalog entry for the 
object itself?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2009-06-30 13:11:39
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2009-06-30 13:02:27
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group