Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>> - There doesn't seem to be any way to push the verify mode down to the
>>> backup/backupall/backupglobals/restore dialogues, or to the debugger
>>> (which, annoyingly, still has it's own connection class). Do we want
>>> to re-verify in those places, or just set verify=none, as we've
>>> already verified at initial connection? I guess in theory a mitm
>>> attack could start after we initially connect.
>> Ick. I'll need to look into that. We must absolutely verify every
>> connection, anything else is very stupid.
This look better?
(I haven't actually tested the backup stuff :-P But it builds..)
I also noticed we have windows linebreaks in at least one file in the
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: svn||Date: 2009-03-16 19:46:55|
|Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r7711 - trunk/pgadmin3/pgadmin|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2009-03-16 18:08:44|
|Subject: Re: pgAdminIII 1.10 Visual Tour|