Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-01-29 18:18:49
Message-ID: 4981F309.2090909@pinpointresearch.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
>
>   
>>>> 3. Date handling
>>>> Sometimes I've got data with invalid dates and it would be great if it
>>>> could replace all the bad ones with, say "0000-00-00".
>>>>     
>>>>         
>> Oh dear $DEITY, no. 
>>     
>
> I think it would be best if we limited ourselves right now to discussing the
> problems themselves and not debating the pros and cons of possible solutions.
>
> I want to encourage people to post their peeves even if they know perfectly
> well the reasons why things are the way they are.
>
>   

Fair enough.

My big pg_dump peeve: the inability to dump a function-definition with 
pg_dump.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Steve AtkinsDate: 2009-01-29 18:22:16
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2009-01-29 18:16:19
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group