Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: "M(dot) Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb(at)cesmail(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
Date: 2009-01-26 21:48:41
Message-ID: 497E2FB9.6070407@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> At the CMG meeting I asked the disk drive engineers, "well, if the
> drives are doing the scheduling, why does Linux go to all the trouble?"
> Their answer was something like, "smart disk drives are a relatively
> recent invention." But

One more reason?
I imagine the disk drives wouldn't be aware of IO scheduling classes
and priorities ( http://linux.die.net/man/1/ionice ), while I imagine
the linux I/O schedulers should.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 2009-01-26 21:56:48 Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
Previous Message David Rees 2009-01-26 20:58:06 Re: [PERFORMANCE] Buying hardware